Fee-earners are already using it
On personal accounts, outside the firm's control, with client documents. A firm-wide policy prohibiting AI has not stopped this anywhere.
Every request tagged to a matter, priced to the penny, and recorded in an audit trail your compliance officer can export. Installed in your own environment, using your own provider accounts.
A worked demonstration using fictional data for a 46-person firm.
On personal accounts, outside the firm's control, with client documents. A firm-wide policy prohibiting AI has not stopped this anywhere.
Subscriptions sit on partners' expenses. No one can say which client's work consumed what.
When your PII renewal asks how AI is governed, a policy document is not evidence of practice.
From Sophos XGS weekly export, 01/05/2026 to 01/06/2026. 4,182 events. 7 of the identities could not be matched to a person.
75% of the people detected are using Tessera.
38 of 51
Identities reaching an AI service in the demo firm's own firewall logs, and how many of them are people working inside Tessera. The rest are the onboarding list.
A matter code is required before anything is sent. Untagged usage is visible, by fee-earner, as a percentage.
Priced at the moment of the request against the rate in force, so historic figures never shift. Export by matter for your billing period.
Append-only. Every request charged to this matter, most recent first.
| When | Fee-earner | Task | Model | Tier | Cost |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 25/08/2026 09:41 | Anna Gourlay | Due diligence analysis | o3 reasoning | Tier 3 | £0.27 |
| 24/08/2026 16:02 | Lorna Ogilvie | File note | GPT-4o | Tier 2 | £0.0172 |
| 24/08/2026 11:18 | Shona Rennie | Clause extraction | GPT-4o mini | Tier 1 | £0.0004 |
| 20/08/2026 15:33 | Paula Moffat | Precedent review | GPT-4o | Tier 2 | £0.0048 |
412 requests · £48.90 charged
£0.004821
What one request cost: 1,704 tokens of prompt and 350 in reply, at the rate in force that day. The ledger holds six decimal places; the screens round to four.
A line for every request in the period, including refusals and the reason each model was chosen.
Requests not served at the tier the rules suggested. Escalations should carry a written reason.
| When | Matter | Suggested | Served | Reason | Cost |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 25/08/2026 15:07 | COMM/2026/0085 | Tier 1 | Tier 2 | User escalation | £0.0092 |
| 25/08/2026 11:52 | EXEC/2026/0135 | Tier 2 | Tier 2 | Provider fallback | £0.0141 |
| 21/08/2026 16:30 | LIT/2026/0140 | Tier 2 | Tier 1 | User downgrade | £0.0007 |
Routine extraction does not need your most expensive model. Tessera suggests a tier, shows the fee-earner the cost before they run it, and records every override.
Append-only. Who ran what, against which matter, on which model, in which region, and what was blocked. Exportable by date range.
Installed in your firm's own Microsoft environment. Your data does not pass through us and we hold no copy of it.
It uses your firm's own accounts with the AI providers. We do not resell model access and your inference spend never appears on our invoice.
Your provider contracts already commit to not training on your data. Tessera's job is to enforce which providers are permitted and to prove what actually happened.
7 years
How long the demo firm keeps the prompt and output behind each request. The period is the firm's own setting, and the ledger entry outlives the text either way.
UK law firms of roughly 20 to 100 fee-earners, with a practice manager or COLP who needs to answer questions about AI use and currently cannot.
Not a legal research tool. Not a drafting assistant. Not a replacement for Copilot or the tools your fee-earners already use. Tessera sits underneath them and records what they cost.
Built in Scotland.